Skip to main content

Why didn't Erie, PA develop into a bigger city?

         Recently I had to travel up to Erie, PA for business.   It's about an hour north of me and is a rather small city, having just under 100 thousand people living in it.   It played an important role in the founding of America,  - where it was the headquarters for Oliver Perry's flagship Niagara during the battle of Like Erie in the war of 1812.  

   


    It was also a important shipping center, being Pennsylvania's only access to the Great Lakes which was the easiest way to trade with parts of Canada at the time as well as move goods to the cities of Detroit and Chicago, which in the mid to early 1800's were just starting to develop.  It was also directly north from Pittsburgh which was a major industrial city at that time.

    Yet Erie never really grew beyond it's humble beginnings and I wondered why.   Like any good sleuth I turned to the internet where I found mostly wrong answers.    Many people thought the port of Erie was to shallow to handle most shipping today, however at twenty nine feet deep it's actually two feet deeper then Chicago's, Detroit's and Buffalo's ports.  Both cities handle millions of dollars in shipping each year, so the port depth is not the reason.   There had to be another reason.

    Erie also is one of the few cities with a natural bay formed by Presque Isle, which would have served as a natural defense against storms and harsh winter weather.   It's overall weather is actually marginally better than places like Detroit, Chicago or Buffalo, so it seemed doubtful that nature could have played a role in it's lack of growth right?  

    Chicago owes a lot to the history of the railroad and it's rapid growth from a city of 4000 people when it was founded in 1837 to a city of 1000,000 just forty years later.  Erie's population in the 1870's was still around 20,000 people.   

    Erie has an interesting history with the railroads but I'll cover that shorty.   This is where geography starts to play a role.   Although the land around the great lakes themselves is flat, the hills and valleys of Pennsylvania made laying rail track expensive and time consuming.   Where out west, Chicago and Detroit had relativity flat prairie land to build on.   That fueled their rapid expansion and growth since supplies could be shipped out west quickly and cheaply not only from the east but from Canada as well.

    Still though, Erie had a deep natural port and the luck of lying between Buffalo, Cleveland and destinations out west.   Their were rail lines running directly through the city at the time, and although the city was starting to develop, it sill did not develop like it's larger neighbors were. 

    .  What is often lost to history is the war is that not rail lines were the same, that often in the early days their was no standardized track or "gauge;"  being the width between the rails.   This lead to the infamous Erie Gauge War, which was actually Erie business community thinking in the short term.   It was politicians trying to get reelected and about how the "little guy" often gets held back by the larger powers that be.  


    The Erie Gauge War, like most wars, was about money.

    Basically there were three railroads at the time that were shipping goods through Erie in a East - West direction.  You had the Erie and Northwest Railroad laying track eastward towards the New York border with a gauge of six-feet, they were an Erie based company.    At the same time, you had the Franklin Canal Company and the Buffalo and State line railways expanding westward towards Erie with a gauge of four feet and ten inches.   

    Erie basically ended up being a place where people had no choice but to change trains.   They needed places to stay overnight in some cases.  Restaurants, bars and other "entertainment" popped up all over and for a brief time the city boomed as freight had to be moved from one train to another. A lot of  money could be made at this "enforced stopping site."

    However the good times could not last as the Buffalo and State Railroad bought up roughly two-thirds of the land in and around Erie with the intention of replacing the six-foot gauge with their own rails.

    This resulted in the city of Erie barring the rail companies from crossing the streets with their trains to maintain the different gauges, and ensure that the money kept flowing in.   The city even went so far as to swear in 150 special police constables to help destroy a railroad bridge (which the city engineers oversaw).   

    In the nearby town of Harborcreek, the tracks were actually torn up.  Only to be replaced three days later by the railroad.   That very night they were town up again, this time the citizens in the area went so far as to plow over a level crossing and knock down a bridge.

    This, of course led to an injunction against the city of Erie and Harborcreek.   One of the city officials, upon being shown the seal of the United States on the injunction, supposedly threw it on the ground and stomped on it.  Declaring his heal mark was the seal of Harborcreek.  

    Eventually the "war" was settled and Erie did win some concessions, however it would still be decades before Pittsburgh steel was transported in any major amount out of the port of Erie.  The rail companies also were able to bypass the city of Erie to a great extent as well.

    At the time as well there was no Erie to Pittsburgh rail traffic, so no steel or coal or iron was being shipped out from Erie on a regular basis.  Erie and it's port was effective removed from the equations.  I highly recommend reading the Erie History Blog and Erie Yesterday for more information about this time in history.  Even the great Mark Twain wrote about it.  


    Erie was also missing one major ingredient that adds to the growth of a city.   A river.

    While it did provide access to Lake Erie in Pennsylvania, that was all it did.    Unlike the cities of Chicago, Cleveland or Detroit, there were no rivers or canals to ship goods into the interior quickly and cheaply.    While rail travel between Pittsburgh and Erie would eventually be established, it would occur after Erie had its chance to grow.  

    The city frankly "failed" in another way.   This was the time of the robber barons; the city of Erie never had it's Frick or Carnegie.  It never had it's Ford, it's Rockefeller or Vanderbilt.   Even the Erie and Northwest Railroad only managed about twenty miles of rail line at it's height, and were simply crashed by the larger companies at the time.  Without having someone in it's corner, it was simply bypassed by the powers that be at the time. 

Comments

  1. It is mainly due to the fact that Erie is located in Pennsylvania. Erie's location being the sole part of the state that is on a Great Lake, while the power centers of the state were (are) far removed, and already well established by the time Great Lakes port cities came into being. This is not the case in other Great Lakes states. New York quickly realized the value of a port on the Lakes and built the Erie Canal to Buffalo, while Philadelphia sat on its hands. Cleveland became the largest city in OH, Detroit in MI, Chicago in IL, Milwaukee in WI as those very states were being established... get it?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Agree with the above. And not having a river has nothing to do with it. Cleveland did not have a river either. And neither Cleveland nor Detroit had a river to ship good into the interior as you claim above. The Cuyahoga was a shallow, meandering marshy creek that had to be completey widened, dredged, and actually moved west of its original location to be partly navigable at its mouth. It is not navigable far inland at all. Pennsylvania could have done the same with Mill Creek with an extension to French Creek (which is an actual river) and to the Allegheny, if Pennsylvania had the stones back in the day to do it. They didn't. Erie was a foreign place to most Pennsylvanians, and remains so to this very day.

    ReplyDelete
  3. There are a number of reasons erie did not grow properly and a lot goes back to city mismanagement. I think a lot of points made were valid but one missed is I90 was supposed to run through the city and did not. Instead it allowed millcreek to grow rapidly and become the 14 largest municipality in PA.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

What all the cool kids are reading.

Paradigm shifts and Project 2040

In 1906, Alfred Henry Lewis stated, “ There are only nine meals between mankind and anarchy. ” His observation has been echoed by people ever since and changed a bit over time, but has remained a stark warning. Only anarchy the way most people think of it rarely occurs.  We have found that people are more likely to band together when their communities face some sort of disaster, be it from war, plague or natural disaster.   We are all too familiar with pictures and videos of communities digging through the rubble of bombed buildings searching for survivors...but how many of us remember the moments during the Covid epidemic of people singing from their balconies?   When you have a community; people will always help people.  Despite these bleak times the things that make us human - our compassion - will see us through. Recently my life changed due to issues with a car .  While, in the scheme of things it was a minor crisis it did make me think if things could have been done differently,

Want a greener and technology advanced future? Look to the Amish for guidence.

Years ago when I lived in Charlotte, North Carolina I was teaching 7th and 8th grade science.  One lesson in particular I remember very well.   It was on the uses of technology and I hoped to impress upon those kids one thought and one thought only.    Technology is neutral; it's what you do with it that matters. At that time there were no computers in the classroom and cell phones were still big bulky devices.  However these kids would be one of the first generations to deal with the technology we now take for granted.  So it was important that they at least an inkling of the promise of technology,  and how to deal with those consequences of technology. I still have my concerns about how we as a society approach technology and what, if anything, we have learned about it. We can learn from the past of course, but that's always jaded.   If only we had a real world example in the here and now that could serve as a guide on how to approach technology. Where I live today is